Wyniki programem CrystalDiskMark 3.0:
class6:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 © 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [sATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 16.300 MB/s
Sequential Write : 11.779 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 16.092 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 2.040 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 4.646 MB/s [ 1134.2 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.019 MB/s [ 4.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 4.726 MB/s [ 1153.8 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.023 MB/s [ 5.7 IOPS]
Test : 100 MB [H: 44.6% (3165.2/7102.4 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2010/03/31 17:38:57
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x86)
class4:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 © 2007-2010 hiyohiyo
Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [sATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 19.996 MB/s
Sequential Write : 11.142 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 19.630 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 1.954 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.506 MB/s [ 856.0 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 0.017 MB/s [ 4.2 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 3.561 MB/s [ 869.4 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.024 MB/s [ 5.8 IOPS]
Test : 100 MB [H: 0.0% (0.0/7585.2 MB)] (x5)
Date : 2010/03/31 17:21:42
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition [6.1 Build 7600] (x86)
Czy to możliwe żeby class4 był lepszy od class6? Myślałem że PQI jest dobrą firmą ...
---------- Post dołączono o 17:49 ---------- Poprzedni post napisano o 17:43 ----------
class 4 jest kingston